The Xiegu X6100 is a great radio, but gets hot to the touch when used with digital modes. Mine got as hot as 55 degrees Celsius (130 F). Maybe within specs, but for me too much. The root cause is the transceiver’s heatsink. (and off course the heat production inside). The heatsink has an ‘capital I’-profile, with the largest area of the heatsink inside the radio itself! This is where the heat producing components are mounted. The heat tis then transfed to the outside of the X6100. Only the top and bottom of heatsink of the radio are on the outside: this is the only place where the heat is actually dissipated. Or: … should be dissipated. The problem is that these top and bottom heat dissipating surfaces are not very large and have almost no fins. Result: the rig heats up to an unpleasantly high level.
An alternative way to overcome the X6100 heating problem is by adding a fan. Best place i.m.h.o. at the bottom. But a fan consumes power and produces noise.
Another (more elegant?) way is enlarging the effective dissipation surface where it matters most: at the bottom. Preferably easy removable. The heatsink has to be fixed in a reliable way, preferably without drilling holes in the rig itself. By the way: also the back of the Xiegu dissipates some heat and the surface is relative big. However, the back it is not a part of the actual heatsink and just sheetmetal that happens to touch the heatsink where it is screwed on. Only cooling the back of the rig is not a good idea and that is why I did not put a heatsink to the back. But you could if you want, just keep in mind that it will not be as effective.
You can see how I attached the add on heatsink without drilling holes. I used magnets -which I glued on the bottom of the rig- and other magnets in the heatsink. When needed (working digital, that’s when the X6100 heats up most) I can add the auxiliary heatsink easily.
As a prototype I used a standard aluminium heatsink (160 x 25 x 10 mm) I had lying round in my shack. These heatsinks are sold for cooling LEDS. I drilled three 8 mm holes in it and glued 3 strong 8mm diameter Nd magnets flush. Between the magnets I added heat conducting pads (1 mm thickness). I spray-painted the heatsink black on the visible side so it looks niver on a black rig. To the bottom of the X6100 I glued 3, 1mm high same thickness as the heat conducting pads) Nd magnets. This contraption makes the heatsink ‘click’ to the rig nicely and also secures that the heat conducting pads are pressed to the rigs bottom heatsink firmly. This to ensure a goof heat transfer the from the bottom to the add on heatsink. As the add on heatsink has a much larger dissipation surface, its capacity is enlaregd significantly. The rig now stays cool nicely. Because the heatsink itself I used is not very high (just 10 mm) the X6100 can still be used in the tilted position. See the picture below.
By the way: the heat is -off course- also transported to the top side of the rig and -for a part- to the back. The effective area of the top is even tinier then the bottom because of the buttons. I did not put a heatsink on top, but one could do so. Beware: if your X6100 has the paracord carrying handle you must ensure to keep some space between the handle and the top heatsink. Because when the paracord handle rests on the top-heatsink, it more or less acts like a blanket, hampering the heat dissipation on the top of the rig!
And, does it work? Yes, by adding the heatsink the X6100 stays cool, even when using digital modes. Also: with the heatsink added, the X6100 can still be used in the tilted position.
I see that you put the heatsinks on the bottom. This make sense after looking at where the heat is showing in the photos. What do you think the effectiveness of the heatsinks on the back? I also see many placing them on the back. Thanks for the advice. Darcy VE7DCY
Hi Darcy,
Good question and thanks for replying, you are the fist one 😉 !
I saw this (i.e. heatsinks mounted to the back) too and doubt the effectiveness. The backplate is relatively thin and screwed on with just a few screw. From a thermal point of view it is minimally connected to the main heatsink. I suspect a significant thermal resistance as the heat has to be transfered from the heatsink to the back first, before it can be transfered to an auxiliary cooler. So … placing extra heatsinks at the back is IMHO suboptimal. But better than nothing. The only advantage I can think of is the ease of mounting, as the back has a nice flat surface.
Kind regards, Robert.
I agree. Ease of attaching is the only reason I can think of. Have you considered any other attachment options on the bottom? I like the magnet option but not sure I want to “glue” some magnets to the bottom to make the connection. The surface is not smooth so to make a good contact is a challenge. I have been thinking about this for some time now since seeing the post but have not come up with any better solutions. Any other thoughts on how to make this work? Thanks.
Darcy VE7DCY
Hi Darcy, II also was a bit reluctant to glue magnets on. And, indeed I tried to find other ways to make the connection. One option I considered is to attach the auxiliary heatsink by somehow making use of the small caveats between the plastic bumper (left and right) and the bottom heatsink.
Kind regards, Robert
May be some possibility there. Will have to keep on thinking on this one. Please keep me informed if you have a great alternative idea. I’m going to do some more thinking on it as well. Thanks for the dialogue.
Darcy
VE7DCY